Thirst for the fountain of insights, not some junk food half-truth delights

Luke 4:24-30. No prophet is accepted in his own native place

When have facts become a matter of opinion?

When has truth become a matter of preference?

Perhaps it is when we as a society placed more premium on sense-experiences, equating pain and suffering with punishment, and pleasure with rewards. The truth is not always pleasant.

We should not dull our natural inclination to search for insights and meaning. Conspiracy theories and narratives are fascinating and spectacular, but isn’t the authentic search for insights more fulfilling?

Thirst for the fountain of insights, not some junk food half-truth delights.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 80: MARCH 21, 2022]

Good fruits require good plants, good soil, and a good gardener

Luke 13:1-9. The parable of the fig tree

What does it mean to be converted? To be transfigured? To undergo metamorphosis?

Real transformation cannot happen to a basic entity alone without any interaction with other entities, similar to how fig trees cannot bear fruit without good soil and a good gardener. The interactions between these entities allow good fruit to emerge – a new entity unique and independent but related with other entities that interacted to produce it.

Imagine – what good fruits can business, organizations, and educational institutions produce if it leans into its entanglement with other sectors of society? The possibilities our boundless.

Sometimes, we are keen to use sexy buzzwords such as “disruptive innovation” or “radical transformations” or “sustainable development”. But these can only happen authentically if our desired sustainable outcomes are clear, and if various institutions harmonize into an ecosystem of virtues.

Relating this a bit to Philippine politics, who is the leader who can cultivate good fruits? Who will not polarize, but rather, harmonize us?

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 79: MARCH 20, 2022]

Authentic righteousness is fair and merciful

Matthew 1:16, 18-21, 24a. Joseph finds out about Mary’s pregnancy

Imagine you are a man engaged to a woman, then suddenly, you find out that the woman you are engaged with is pregnant, and you did not have intercourse with this woman. What would you reasonably conclude? Most likely, the woman had an affair.

Of course, Joseph would be surprised and pained to discover that Mary is pregnant. If Joseph became filled with rage, it would be perfectly reasonable. But without having any form of divine revelation yet, Joseph’s move is already admirable: silently divorce Mary so that Mary will not be stoned to death (as is the custom for women supposedly guilty of adultery). This is already admirable in itself. At this point, it’s perfectly reasonable for Joseph to conclude that Mary cheated on him with another man; Joseph could have opted to just not care about Mary at all. But in this most stressful of situations, he chose to be a better man. This is fair AND merciful.

The Immaculate Conception is a miracle that cannot be naturally explained, so I think it is perfectly fitting for God to help Joseph in his predicament by sending angels to guide his reflections. I wonder, what went inside Joseph’s head?

I infer that he thought of Mary’s pristine track record, his faith in God, and the very untypical event that Mary, of all people, would have cheated on him. In a sense, the decision of Joseph to trust Mary is the fruit of intersecting faith and reason. If Mary would have had a history of cheating in the past, would Joseph have believed any messages from an angel? I doubt it. If logic and reason were to prevail alone, it is more practical to conclude that Mary cheated.

Imagine the discernment Joseph had to do to reconcile reason and faith. If Joseph purely relied on faith, he would just immediately believe Mary’s claim that she is pregnant with the Son of God but she didn’t cheat on Joseph. But a reasonable man needs evidence and time to discern, which Joseph required, and in God’s mercy, He helped Joseph in his journey.

Maybe the lesson is that a person who strives to be authentic in being fair and merciful, even in the most unusual of circumstances, encourages God to grant a greater grace. Authentic righteousness can create a virtuous cycle of grace and spiritual wisdom.

Just as Joseph was fair and merciful to Mary, God was fair and merciful to Joseph. Isn’t this a great example of being a living likeness of God?

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 78: MARCH 19, 2022]

Caring means enabling the plant to bear fruit

Matthew 21:33-43, 45-46. The Kingdom of God will be taken away from evil men and given to a people that will produce its fruit

The reward is in giving, caring, and loving. The reward is the act of enabling a plant to bear fruit or enabling a person to flourish, that is, be better today than yesterday.

The “Kingdom” or “heaven” or “garden” is not a place for the greedy to take unlimited gold and fruits. Rather, it is the embodiment or sanctuary for the givers and the caretakers to continue cultivating a flourishing ecosystem.

Isn’t it a paradox? The more a person seeks reward and incentives, the more the person is tempted to be greedy.

To refer again the Beatles (The End): In the end, it’s not about how much love we take, but how much love we make.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 77: MARCH 18, 2022]

Ignorance versus innocence

Luke 16:19-31. The parable of the rich man and Lazarus

It’s very convenient to turn a blind eye to the suffering around us. Our temporary comfort can feel like a distraction from those who need us, and in this sense, indeed, ignorance is bliss.

Do ignorance and innocence mean the same thing? When we utter “ignore”, there seems to be an active act compared with the term “innocent”. Ignoring means actively not paying attention to something; while innocence is more of a state where a person or a child is not yet familiar with certain information about the world.

The ignorant deliberately chooses to avoid thinking, feeling, and paying attention. Can we say the same thing about an innocent child?

The innocent child, in my experience, is very curious and inquisitive. The child instinctively knows that he knows little, so he incessantly asks anything, without any preconceived notion about “political correctness” or “acceptable norms”.

This is not the same with the ignorant, who chooses to actively ignore; to prioritize convenience over the dilemma of knowing that another person may be burdened, and ignoring the possibility that we could help the needy.

I think that the parable of the rich man and Lazarus is not about condemning the rich man for having material goods. Rather, the parable is about willful ignorance, treating material things as a distraction or excuse not to pay attention to the others. The rich man may be thinking, “I am comfortable, why should I bother?” This can be interpreted in an ego-centric manner, because if the rich man thought about others beyond himself, he may be compelled to conclude that he needs to help the marginalized like Lazarus was.

This parable is very appropriate for business leaders and educators. Are we willfully ignoring externalities, choosing a convenient lens where a business only seeks to maximize its profits? We cannot claim innocence anymore, given the history of businesses and even other types of organizations becoming a cog in the systemic approach to corruption.

Living an authentic good life is not without discomfort, because we are compelled to pay attention not only to our experiences, but to the experiences of others. It’s troubling and uncomfortable to be knowledgeable, powerful, and wise, because we abandon our claims of innocence. But isn’t this what vocations are about? We are called to think and feel beyond ourselves, while finding our niche in a flawed society we desire to flourish.

As children, we’re innocent and curious. As adults, we should be insightful and authentic.

Not ignorant.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 76: MARCH 17, 2022]

Finding authenticity in the leadership roles and positions we play

Matthew 20:17-28. The Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve

When we know people holding positions of power, we naturally strive to build goodwill with that leader so that we may gain some sort of favor. Consistent with the previous gospels, Jesus dares us to think beyond appearances. When a woman asked Jesus to let her sons be His left and right hand in His kingdom, what was she thinking? Was the woman thinking about the appearance of power and the apparent authority of being the left and right hand men of a king?

Notice how business students define what a typical career path is:

“I want to graduate, be a management trainee in a multinational company, and eventually be a C-level executive!”

We explain our career and leadership path in terms of positions and roles we play. But have we rarely hear people say:

“I want to be in any role that allows me to help the most number of people I could”.

We hear about positions and power, but not so much about vocation and mission. And this is what our department and college is trying to emphasize: being a management leader is not about prestige, but more about using influence for the common good. It’s easy and cheesy to say this, but it’s hard and messy to act on this. This is why I think continuous reflection, insighting, and action research are very important.

If we seek power for power’s sake, are we being authentic to what it really means to be a human? The paradox is that those we consider as the greatest leaders are those who did not seek power for power’s sake, but instead, those who sought opportunities to make this a world a better version of itself.

In a sense, appearances, ego, and power may be needed at first, but ultimately, they are distractions from authenticity and integral flourishing.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 75: MARCH 16, 2022]

Listen to the speaker’s “good talks”, but do not follow the speaker’s “bad walks”

Matthew 23:1-12. The scribes and the Pharisees have taken their seat on the chair of Moses

Sometimes, we humans do not walk our talk. We have heard countless horror stories coming from moral authorities and ethicists preaching what is supposed to be right, but their actions are not right. Sometimes it is unintentional given our flaws; but what is wretched is when politicians rely on appearances and perceptions without good actions that justify what they talked about. This is the very meaning of bullshit — without regards to truth, only to one’s appearance.

(This is why I’ve grown to think that the intentional BS-er is the true enemy of the authentic, rather than the liar. At least, the liar cares for the truth, but intends to veer the listener away from it. The BS-er does not care at all, and it makes the BS-er more dangerous.)

As someone who is in the teaching profession, my fear is that I could be inconsistent or inauthentic. The pressure is real when I discuss ethics and claim a more mature or to be a moral authority as a teacher — what if I’m just an impostor?

This is why it is important for listeners to be critical. If I say something wise but do otherwise, does that negate the wisdom of what I said? Not at all. Thus, it is important for the listener to discern, to critique; and for the one speaking, to be open to criticism and dialogue.

As I write these reflections, I may be “talking my talk”. At the same time, I know how difficult it is to “walk my talk”. Posting these reflections publicly in my Facebook wall and in my blog is a pressure. But at the same time, I think, feel, and believe that there is power in honing my craft while contemplating on my spirituality.

I recently listened to the recent reflections of Jordan B. Peterson and his drifting away from atheism. It seems that he is beginning to embrace a more theistic view of the world through Christianity. And he mentioned the importance of authenticity, i.e., consistency and integrality, in words and actions. I admire how he tries to be as precise as he can when he articulates his beliefs; he tries to fully mean what he says and he acknowledges the limitations of his claims and beliefs.

The scribes and the Pharisees may be hypocrites, but they are still capable of speaking and writing about what is good. Business persons, PR specialists, and politicians may be masters at greenwash, but there is still some good to be derived from the pristine image they try to project.

The challenge is for the audience to adopt a more active role — paying proactive attention, rather than waiting to be passively stimulated by spectacle. Listen to the speaker’s “good talks”, but do not follow the speaker’s “bad walks”.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 74: MARCH 15, 2022]

Competing with one’s self

Luke 6:36-38. Because the standard you use will be the standard used for you

The prayer for serenity, courage, and wisdom is a very beautiful prayer because it makes us reflect about our reasonable controllables and non-controllables. One thing I learned in studying a critical realist view of causality is the inescapable influence of social structures and culture on our personal agency. We are placed in different contexts; some abundant in blessings, some more challenging.

The fairest comparison we could have is only to ourselves and the standards we hold ourselves accountable to. In a sense, competitions are both inspirations and distractions; they can inspire us through role models, but without full appreciation of context, they can impose unreasonable expectations.

What I love about the concept of flourishing and excellence is that it is not about rankings. In theory, everyone can flourish and excel. Integral human development is not a zero-sum game. As we learned from the parable of the talents, what matters is how a person maximizes one’s potential no matter how small one starts with.

The challenge: can businesses and organizations come up with policies that promote flourishing instead of rankings? It is possible.

And perhaps business schools should take the first step and lead.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 73: MARCH 14, 2022]

In pursuit of personal change

Luke 9:28b-36. The transfiguration of Jesus

The transfiguration is a mystical event, a form of literal metamorphosis; a radical change or conversion. Should we aspire for our own version of transfiguration?

I do not think it is necessary. I remember one of my dad’s favorite quotes he uses in his speeches: “The only permanent thing in this world is change. Change can be so constant that you could not feel the difference.”

A virtuous cycle of reflection and action towards flourishing can feel like there’s no difference. I feel that there is elegance in this subtlety, because this kind of change does not beg for a spectacle to happen. The accumulation of insights, wisdom, and virtues can be like an hourglass gently dropping the sands of time.

Isn’t this more authentic? To some, discipline and consistency are boring, compared to buzzwords of disruption and innovation.

But there are times when boring consistency (ala Tim Duncan) is more authentic and resilient than a spectacle of temporary disruption. Personal change need not be radical; it could be as slow as the steady tortoise who is sure of his integral development and flourishing.

Inch by inch, bit by bit, we can become better today than yesterday.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 72: MARCH 13, 2022]

Doing and being good is not without pain

Matthew 5:43-48. Love your enemies

The Christian calling is to go above what is required or expected. Doing so entails sacrifices. Fasting and abstinence during lent are reminders that the path to virtue is not without pain; there are sacrifices and suffering along the way.

How do we define enemies anyway? Are they people whose very existence is contrary to our own and what we stand for? Do such people really exist?

Loving one’s enemies is thought provoking, and our instincts would always lead us away from the source of our pain. Avoiding our enemies is not a sin, and it is safer.

But dignifying our enemies is lovelier. This is a cross we are called to bear and struggle with.

[DAILY GOSPEL INSIGHTS AND REFLECTION FOR MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 71: MARCH 12, 2022]